Archive | Church RSS feed for this section

Social Justice, Guilt and Grace

What is the Mission of the Church?“Doing justice means not showing partiality, not stealing, not swindling, not taking advantage of the weak because they are too uninformed or unconnected to stop you. We dare say that most Christians in America are not guilty of these sorts of injustices, nor should they be made to feel that they are. We are not interested in people feeling bad just to feel bad, or worse, people thinking there is moral high ground in professing most loudly how bad they feel about themselves. If we are guilty of injustice individually or collectively, let us be rebuked in the strongest terms. By the same token, if we are guilty of hoarding our resources and failing to show generosity, then let us repent, receive forgiveness, and change. But when it comes to doing good in our communities and in the world, let’s not turn every possibility into a responsibility and every opportunity into an ought. If we want to see our brothers and sisters do more for the poor and the afflicted, we’ll go farther and be on safer ground if we use grace as our motivating principle instead of guilt.”

- Kevin DeYoung and Greg Gilbert

 

Preachers and Sex Sermons: Then and Now

J. Sidlow Baxter and the Sex Sermon Preachers
I have always enjoyed J. Sidlow Baxter’s (1903 – 1999) material. I regularly still use his classic “Explore the Book”, a complete Bible survey course that is outstanding. It’s still in print and there’s also a Kindle edition.)  His devotional writing style, reverent approach to scripture and keen insights into God’s Word, make him a joy to study. In 1974 he released a book entitled “Rethinking Our Priorities: The Church, It’s Pastor and People.” It covered a wide range of subjects and while much in it was very helpful, it also reflects the values and upbringing associated with a man born in Australia in 1903 and raised in Lancashire, England. Baxter’ like all of was a product of his time. He attended Spurgeon’s Theological College in London and was a pastor in Scotland and England. Even so, some principles and priorities are timeless and deserve to be revisited.

What struck me when I read the following was just how true the statement is that “the more things change, the more things remain the same.”  What many perceive as a problem now, Baxter did then.

Preachers and Sex – From “Rethinking Our Priorities” by J. Sidlow Baxter

“Is it not overdue that some of us should inveigh against the new over-proneness to talk sex from pulpit and platform? Let me here utter a protest against those preachers nowadays who seem to think that in order to appear modernly psychological or bravely attractive they must always bring sex into their public speaking. I, for one, am nauseated by it, and I believe that a long suffering majority of others feel the same way. The jolting over frankness with which some ministers and conference speakers talk about marital relationships and sex experience is disgusting.

 

They tell me that one has to be boldly frank in order to deal with the sex problems of the day. I deny this. Much that goes by the name of frankness is veneered vulgarity. Sometimes the speaker can scarcely disguise his own sickly relish and morbid pleasure in the subject. Far fewer of us are deceived than such speakers think; and when they punctuate their over-intimate comments with jocular sex anecdotes or remarks which evoke a few inane giggles from folk in the congregation who will laugh at anything spicy, we despise them.

 

Let us get a few things straight. If for some acute reason sex  matters simply must be publicly spoken of in some Christian service or conference, it should be done without descriptive detail, with very carefully restrained phrase, and with becoming reticence. That which belongs to private counseling is not for public parade. I have known persons for whom these public expatiations on sex matters have created problems which they never had before. Instead of solving problems the speaker has inflamed them.

 

In these days, when there are so many books written on sex and marriage, including wise and useful publications by Christian ministers, doctors, and psychologists, what need is there for this pulpit and platform lingering with face-reddening intimacy over the sex quarrels, sex-disappointments, sex-fulfillments, or sex-estrangements, and so on, of married couples and others? To me it is like a conducted tour of drains and sewers, and the preacher seems to love being down there.

 

One of the most angering things of all is that the sexual matters descriptively dilated upon could be referred to far more effectively with respectful restraint. People know well enough what we mean, and how we are trying to help, without a lot of smutty elaborating…
Today, we live in a sex-mad society. We should avoid anything in our Christian services and fellowships which adds to the general sex emphasis. We should do everything we can to restore a sense sacredness to the subject of marital relationship. Things which were divinely meant to be private and sacred and referred to only with reverent respect are discussed with blatant freeness, until nearly all the decency and dignity of life is being martyred. Such trends do not engender social purity and happiness; they bring uncleanness and misery.

 

Our churches and Christian meetings should strike a deliberate contrast. Instead of lingering on fleshly, ugly, animalistic aspects of nuptial and sexual relationships, we should keep turning the minds of our people to the higher and purer and holier aspects of love and wedlock and family life. It is in the light of those higher levels of thinking and 0f Scripture teaching that most matrimonial problems find true solution.

 

Perhaps someone still objects: ‘Oh, but the Church should face up to the sex problems of the day.’My reply is threefold. (I) They should not be ‘faced up to’in the brazen way which is common today. (2) They should never be thus ‘faced up to’ in mixed meetings, with males and females, married and single, parents and children, older and younger, all together. ( 3) Any such public ‘facing up’ should be avoided in favor of private counseling.

 

Finally, all such public “facing up” in the objectionable way which I have here denounced is utterly unscriptural. Listen again -to Ephesians 5:3. It says, “But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becometh saints:’ In other words, there are some things which, in Christian gatherings, instead of being “faced up to,” should be faced away from.

 

It is time we put away this dirty-puddle-stirring from Christian platforms… this irreverent and blushing ‘free speech’ about bodily relationships, on the plea that it’s being helpfully realistic, is a make-believe of sickly minds. It belongs to the garbage dump not the Christian desk.  It is time some ministers had something more elevating to talk about.”

 

(I’ve abbreviated the article. If you’d like to read the rest, click here.)

Being an End Time People

Steve Fry
Steve Fry, pastor of The Gate in Nashville and director of Messenger Fellowship, is the author of today’s post.

In his book, Paul, the Spirit and the People of God, Gordon Fee, recounts a time during his tenure at Regent College, when some of his students asked him this question: “ If you were to return to pastoral ministry, what would you do?” Fee says that his answer was immediate: “No matter how long it might take, I would set about with a singular passion to help a local body of believers recapture the New Testament Church’s understanding of itself as an eschatological community.”

I think that in large measure, the average local church in America doesn’t really grasp this. In the charismatic world, the emphasis on the ‘baptism in the Spirit’ is often highly individualized. Most believers – even if they do have the sense that the Holy Spirit is a person – see the Spirit’s infilling work more in terms of personal empowerment.

But what Fee is recognizing here is that our sense of self definition as a church has alarmingly shifted from that of the primitive church we read about in Acts. The first Christians knew that they as a people were to be the taste of the future for their generation in the present. The Apostle Paul speaks of the Holy Spirit as “the down payment” of our future glory. What the Acts Church understood was that the Spirit’s power coming upon them and flowing through them was the sign of the future. They didn’t just look to the future; they knew that in a sense they were the future!

A wise marathon runner studies and knows the course of his race. He knows where the finish line is. Because he knows that that finish line is perhaps twenty miles away, he knows how to run his race at every point.

Knowing where the finish line is determines the way he paces himself and runs his race. For us as The Church it ought to be the same. Because the Holy Spirit indwells us individually and corporately, we should possess a keen awareness of what the ‘end’ looks like and adjust our present priorities and lifestyles in the light of that end.

To put it another way, let me ask a question. What will the end-time people of God look like? If we hold to a biblical worldview – regardless of our particular eschatological viewpoints – we know that there will be a generation who will actually witness the second coming of Christ .

We often hear talk of end time revival and ‘the glory of the lord covering the earth as the waters covers the sea.’ I for one do believe that there will be a manifestation of the glory of God in such a global fashion. What would a fully empowered Church look like just months prior to the coming of Jesus? I think there would be a passion to see lost men and women come to Jesus; I think there would be a passion to worship with abandon; I think there would be a release of authority over the enemy and power to do the works of Jesus in an unprecedented way.

I suggest that to live eschatologically, or as Gordon Fee says to define ourselves as an eschatological community, is to do precisely this: to live with the end in mind. To let the reality of the victory of Jesus at the end of the age shape who we are and what we do in the present time.

John Stott 1921-2011

John R. W. Stott (1921-2011)“Moved by the perfection of His holy love, God in Christ substituted Himself for us sinners. That is the heart of the cross of Christ.” –John Stott

John Stott passed from this world into the presence of God on the 27th at the age of 90. A leader of leaders and pastor to multitudes through his writing, may God multiply the investment he made in all of us many times.