Jeff Ling

” I am struck by the lack of biblical literacy from virtually every voice in this discussion. Let me start with Christians. It seems that we have little sense about what politics does and does not achieve. My brothers and sisters, “we won” is not an appropriate response. Patting ourselves on the back is silly. Moving forward with anything less than continual proclamation of the gospel of the Kingdom of Jesus Christ with the somber realization of the lostness we face is simply missing the point. Politics does not bring victory over sin, death, hell, and the grave – Jesus does. Laws do not change people’s hearts – the Spirit of Christ does. Elections will not bring this country to be a picture of God’s Kingdom – God the Father and his electing purposes will do so when he sends his Son to restore all things at the end of the age. Don’t get me wrong, we ought to vote in a way that reflects God’s Kingdom, and in doing so perhaps some will be confronted with the reality of God and his created order. But please don’t act like temporal laws in a temporal government will ever bring about the true spiritual change that’s needed to redeem hearts, minds, souls, and bodies for Christ.”

 

An excellent article from the Secundum Scripturas blog.

NC Amendment One and President Obama   by Matt Emerson

When it comes to a waste of beauty, I can think of many examples. One would be the dismantlement and disappearance of the The Phelps Organ in Christ Chapel,

At the time it was installed in 1978, the organ was the largest mechanical action organ in the United States.  It was a massive instrument that thundered and whispered with power and beauty.

In 1998 after water and neglect had damaged the organ, there was a move to repair it and then:

“On December 2, 1998, twelve years of silence ended as the organ sounded once again during chapel amidst cheers from the student body. (Mr.) Tracy Russell, the new organist, accompanied the singing of the hymn that morning: Amazing grace, how sweet the sound.

“I’m very thrilled to see it and hear it being used again,” Celestino said. “From the beginning,” when plans to make repairs were announced, “the reaction from the students has been very positive,” he said. In talking with students, he added, “some thought (the organ) was for visual benefit only, because they’d never heard it. It never dawned on them that it made music.” (Story Link)

Never dawned on them that it made music?  University, right?

Nine years later in 2007, pictures showed the organ hidden behind banners and a massive video projection screen. When I was there last February it was no where to be seen. Blue curtains and bland panels covered the space and the grand organ was said to have been dismantled, put into storage and put on sale.

Bill McConnell was chapel organist for the 1999-2000 school year while he was full-time Minister of Music at St. Dunstan’s Episcopal Church in Tulsa and teaching part-time at ORU. He says:

I don’t know that the instrument has been dismantled (it might have been, I just don’t know for sure). It just makes me very sad that funds were spent to build this magnificent instrument, it was allowed to deteriorate once and then restored, and then was allowed to deteriorate again. It is an incredibly poor example of stewardship to use funds for a project of this size and complexity that you haven’t made any plans to sustain.

Shame.

Such a stunning work both visually and acoustically traded in for what? Bands playing the song of the week.

The video below is a nice piece on a young man who discovered what an organ could offer and plays regularly at his church.

Coming in December!? Alright! Oh… 2012. Sigh.

What was meant to be a debate ended up being a lecture by Dr. Craig due to the no-show by Richard Dawkins. It’s a great talk and worth a listen.

When I set out to read The Christian Delusion: Why Faith Fails , I knew I wasn’t in for a particularly pleasant experience. My anticipation was that the author, John Loftus, had surely gone out of his way to paint believers in the worst possible light and he did not disappoint. After a few weeks of being mocked, ridiculed, taunted and despised, I finished the book that one reviewer stated “destroyed Christianity.”

I don’t think so.

Loftus will simply dismiss people like myself as delusional and uneducated. It’s a fact that John does have more degrees than I do and the man has worked hard at what he does. Even so, I wont concede to the status of a pea brain who has given no serious thought to his beliefs. I stand in good company. Countless numbers of brilliant people in all fields ascribe to the same faith as I and do so with confidence.

I read The Christian Delusion in order to better understand the arguments put forth by atheists. The book, which is a compilation of articles with Loftus as editor and a contributor, presents it’s material in a well written fashion with copious footnotes. All the usual subjects of attack are here: the authority of the Bible, the resurrection of Jesus, faith as a social construct, the goodness of God and, surprisingly interesting chapters on cruelty to animals and Nazism as an extension of Christian prejudice and hatred.

What is obvious from the outset is that Loftus and company are interested in only one side of the proverbial coin. For the most part, their sources are those who are already atheists or skeptics. When they quote those who are sympathetic to Christianity, the quotes tend to come from those who hold extremely low views of scripture. This provides a very skewed presentation in regards to Biblical authority. When John Shelby Spong is one of your go to guys for a theologian… well now you just look foolish. There is another side to the coin. There are scholars who date the gospels and letters much earlier than those Loftus and company consult, and who refute with expertise the idea that nothing can be really known of the historical Jesus. There are those who wrestle with the hard questions of faith without succumbing to atheistic views. There are believers who study the neuroscience of belief without dismissing the mystery of spirituality. The saying “it’s not where you start, it’s where you finish,” does not apply here. It does natter where you start. Loftus and company are starting from a closed system which holds no option for a God who could have possibly inspired the Biblical authors. So case closed. But, it begs the question as to whether or not the atheists here are being intellectually honest. Persuasive? maybe. Sarcastic? Undoubtedly. Honest? Hardly.

There are those who have written a comprehensive response to the book.  The Infidel Delusion by Patrick Chan, Jason Engwer, Steve Hays & Paul Manata is a chapter by chapter refutation of The Christian Delusion and well worth pursuing. For those interested, you can watch a debate between John Loftus and one of his favorite targets, Dinesh D’Souza, here.

Do I recommend the book? By no means. Those who need to do research on an academic level may want to read it but the effort can only render results that are mildly but usually mis-informative, slightly entertaining and hopelessly biased.

I still believe.